SOCIALISM 101.
THE REAL UTOPIA IS ATTAINABLE. See HOW:
In his book, UTOPIAS, Lewis Mumford discusses the various genres of UTOPIAS mankind has come up
 with in all history. One of the utopian themes that Mumford talks about are partisan utopias. An example would be socialism.
The characteristic of a partisan utopian vision is that it isn't really about creating a new kind of society, but rather about
 shifting around the pieces of the current system a bit, to make it more fair. Thus socialism doesn't question the virtue of the

industrial-production, wage-employment, resource-exploitation system, but aims to redistribute the wealth more evenly. The
adjective partisan, I believe, refers to the fact that the presentation of the vision amounts to a political act, arguing for a
change that could plausibly be achieved through current legislative action.

Mumford contrasts these kinds of utopias with some of the classical ones, such as Plato's Republic. In the Republic, for
example, a whole picture is presented, of how society would be governed, how people would be educated, how the
economy would function, what civil society would be like, etc. It's a whole coherent vision, perhaps similar to what exists in
many ways, but with some radical changes and with its own internal consistency. It describes a transformation of society,
rather than an alteration.

I see a lot of the partisan utopian proposals these days on the net. For example, there is something called the social credit
movement. These folks have a particular proposal for financial reform, along the lines of distributing money to the population
based on the wealth created in the nation. It's a reasonable proposal, and I'm not doing it justice here in my over-brief
summary. I have no problem with it as a desirable reform proposal. It is however an example of one of these partisan utopian
visions.

And in this case, the partisan aspect is very evident. I presented my own economic ideas to some of these people, my
development model. They were very adamant about how their proposal was the only reasonable way to proceed. Rather
than their proposal being an idea, that could be discussed along with other ideas, it has become a cause, a specific
movement ? either you're with us or against us kind of thing.

I don't mean to single out the social credit people. The same thing happens with all sorts of reform ideas. For some, the
only way forward is financial reform, for others it's election reform, or end of corporate personhood, media reform,
initiatives and referendums, etc. etc.

Mumford sounds very modern in the way he talks about whole systems, and how everything needs to be considered
together, if we want to come up with useful utopian visions. I think this becomes particularly important if we want to talk
about how a transformational vision might actually be achieved.

In the past I've referred to partisan proposals as magic bullet ideas. If only we could pass this one piece of legislation, we'd
catch the establishment off guard and everything would be better. This way of thinking is like the thing they tell children: it's
easy to catch a pigeon, all you have to do is put salt on its tail. Right, if you get close enough to put salt on its tail, you
could have grabbed it instead. If we could pass one of these magic-bullet bills ? one powerful enough to make a real
difference ? the system would need to already change before that. Such a bill can't be passed the way the media and political
system operate.

The Federal Reserve Act was an example of a magic-bullet piece of legislation, but it was the people and their elected
representatives who were caught off guard, not the establishment elite. The sun never sets on their eyes and ears.

I was very pleased by the way Mumford mentions the community a lot, and sees it as a touchstone for examining utopian
ideas. He brings in community casually, as a common sense observation ? that the real meaning of any utopian vision can be
seen in what it would be like to live in a community in that utopia. After all, we all live in a community, and if our community
isn't going to be what we want, is it really all that useful that the society as a whole has changed in some beneficial way?
Perhaps it might be useful, but we aren't really talking about a utopia, something really worth working for, if it isn't what we
want where we live.

In my own work, I first came to see community as being central from a political-science perspective.  If we want to have
democracy, then we need to know what the will of the people is. But what is the will of the people? The fact is that no such
thing exists. We have individuals with ideas, and we have factions with programs. There's no mechanism for the people as a
whole to create or articulate a shared agenda, an inclusive agenda.

It seems self-evident to me that if a means is to be found for the will of the people to come into existence, that means
must operate at the local level, in the community, where the scale is small, the inherently shared interests are maximized, and
people can interact on a face-to-face, ongoing basis. At a minimum, we can say with certainty, that if the will of the people
cannot be brought into existence at the community level, it certainly cannot be brought into existence at any larger level.

Later on, I also came to see community as being central to popular mobilization for change. The model of change-oriented
organizations, with members sprinkled throughout society, leads to divisiveness ? Republicans vs Democrats,
environmentalists vs. unions, or whatever. In this model, activist movements cancel out one another. If whole communities can
mobilize around an agenda, we have a hope of avoiding divisiveness.

Community also becomes central in the thinking that has been done about sustainability. Communities, and the communities
within a bioregion, give us the natural scale at which we can begin to achieve sustainability.

Also, from the perspective of transformation as a general principle, community is a natural focus. If a system is to be really
transformed, into a new kind of system, it has to be built from the bottom up. You can't turn a horse cart into an automobile
by changing it; you need to build an automobile as a new thing, with new operating principles, new materials, etc. etc. That's
why the butterfly is such a good metaphor for transformation. The caterpillar needs to dissolve down to its constituent
proteins, before it can be regenerated as a butterfly. Our communities are society's constituent proteins.

To these perspectives, Mumford adds community as criteria: quality of community as a measure of quality of
transformational vision. by R K Moore

*     *  *     *      *   *     *     *     *      *   *     *     *     *      *   *     *     *     *

Our POSTER is ANITA SANDS HERNANDEZ, Los Angeles Writer, Futurist and Astrologer. Catch up with her websites  TRUTHS GOV WILL HIDE & NEVER TELL YOU, also The  FUTURE, WHAT'S COMIN' AT YA! FRUGAL LIFE STYLE TIPS,  HOW TO SURVIVE the COMING GREAT DEPRESSION, and Secrets of Nature, HOLISTIC, AFFORDABLE HEALING. Also ARTISANRY FOR EXPORT, EARN EUROS..* Anita is at astrology@earthlink.net ). Get a 15$ natal horoscope "my money/future life" reading now + copy horoscope as a Gif file graphic! No smarter, more accurate career reading out there!

<=== BACK TO TRACKING THE ECONOMY, an INDEX PAGE

<===BACK TO MONEY SECRETS ONLY THE EXPERTS KNOW

<=== BACK TO SECRETS THE GOV DOES NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW

<===BACK TO THE SECRETS OF THE OLIGARCHS, THE EMPIRE INDEX PAGE

<=== SHOW ME THE FIX INDEX PAGE.

 <==  SHOW ME THE HAPPY R)EVOLUTION PAGE

<===  BACK TO "GUERILLA CAPITALISM" -- THE SOLUTION!

<==== BACK TO THE "VITAL SIGNS OF A DYING ECONOMY" the "FUTURE" WEBPAGE

<==== BACK TO THE WALL STREET MELTDOWN WEBSITE,  with "WHAT TO DO TO SURVIVE" TIPS

<=== BACK TO ENRON PLANET, the DOOMSDAY SCENARIO!

<====BACK TO THE HOLISTIC GOURMET, BON MARCHE

<=== BACK TO THE FRUGAL ARTISAN IMPORT/ EXPORT TYCOON AND HIS "STUFF"

<===  BACK TO THE GLEENERS PAGE

<==  BACK TO THE FUTURE INDEX PAGE

<=== BACK TO THE GENTLEMAN FARMER'S GARDEN INDEX

<=== INVESTIGATE DOING DRIP IRRIGATE- LINES in drought areas, lucrative, easy to learn in one day.

<=== BACK TO "DONE WELL,  ACTIVISM IS A DELIGHT  and IT CREATES CAREERS for YOU as well as PLANETARY EVOLUTION"

<=== BACK TO THE MALTHUSIAN INDEX PAGE

<===BACK TO THE PHILOSOPHY INDEX PAGE

<=== BACK TO THE LUCK IN LOVE WEBSITE

<== BACK TO THE PROPAGANDA STUDIES WEBSITE, HOW GOV LIES TO YOU

<=== BACK TO ALL POINTS OF THE COMPASS POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY TUTORIAL

<=== BACK TO JERRY'S REFRIGERATOR & the Tin Foil Hat Collection of CONSPIRACY THEORIES!

<====BACK TO THE FREE MONEY WEBSITE

<==== BACK TO THE HARD TIMES WEBSITE

<===== BACK TO THE POVERTY INDEX PAGE

<==== BACK TO THE "TIPS to SURVIVE THE FUTURE" INDEX PAGE
 
BACK TO THE "FIX YOUR FLAGGING AMBITION" SEMINAR

<== BACK TO THE  SNOOKERED INDEX PAGE

<===BACK TO THE REALITY 101 SEMINAR FOR TEENS

<==== BACK TO THE SHOW BUSINESS  ARCHIVE, for writers, producers, video documentarians.

<====HOW TO TINKER WITH OTHER PEOPLE's BRAINS

<====BACK TO THE NEW AGE EMPOWERING INDEX

<===BACK TO "HOW TO MERCHANDISE YOURSELF" INDEX

<===BACK TO THE ALL ABOUT TAXES INDEX PAGE

         <=== BACK TO THE FRUGAL TIPS and CHEAPO  LIFESTYLE WEBPAGE

         <=== MEET ANITA SANDS WHO WRITES ALL THESE ARTICLES

        <=== TAKE ME TO THE HOLISTIC PET, HOW NEVER TO NEED a VET

       <=== BACK TO THE TRUTHS ABOUT DENTISTRY THAT WILL SAVE YOU 100 THOUSAND!

        <=== BACK TO THE SNOOKERED WEBPAGE, HOAXES WE HAVE ALL KNOWN

        <===BACK TO EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT WEB STUFF (for dummies) so you can make your own website.

        <=== BACK TO THE CONVERSATION INDEX   <===== BACK TO THE PHILOSOPHIC DIFFERENCES  INTERPRETED  WEBSITE.


<=== BACK TO "HOW TO MARRY A BILLIONAIRE" A 120 CLASSROOM SEMINAR that teaches THE SUPER BEAUTY how to GIVE UP JOCKS, SACRIFICE HERSELF AND SAVE THE WORLD