Scientific confirmation proves that H1N1 pandemic scare was a fraudulent (criminal) scam!

Hehe, let's call this one pig flu, no !
SWINE FLU! That's the ticket!

What if you could SEW UP CONGRESS, get them to make a law that nobody can sue your butt if your vaccine kills them, is toxic, or even if it's totally un-needed and they want their money back. To get that kind of law first you have to  create the pandemic, then pick some crummy third world country like UKRAINE, infect everyone there with aerial spraying, get a  lot of technicolor horror stories about how bad the disease is, scare everybody, sell your vials by the billion, vaccinate the entire world. And you're in like Flynn.  Have you any idea how much MONNNNNNEYYYY you could make? ONE season, one drug, a billion vials? And all it takes is lubing the hands of a few retard congressmen and melting down some monkey kidneys?

And we schlubs have to get on a freeway at 7 am, and be at work at nine am. Kinda makes you feel stoopid, don't it?

TODAY it's all over the news, Frugal FRANCE is furious. They COMPLAIN they were OVERSOLD VACCINES and are stuck with MILLIONS of doses!  Even Harvard UNIVERSITY admits the whole Swine Flu epidemic was waaaay over-sold. In a media way. Is this an ENRON PHARM THING? Are we gonna have a lot more of these ENGINEERED EPIDEMICS so they can make billions off of us non-scientific, easily scared retards?

A new analysis from Harvard University, using H1N1 deaths in the U.S. in
the spring and projecting likely outcomes for this fall, suggests that
the swine flu pandemic'has been oversold.  But what is ugly is that six months ago
in JULY, 2009, the PHARM INDUSTRY got CONGRESS to pass a law stating that
none of us could sue them. (SEE "SWINE FLU GADGE)

The new paper suggests swine flu was unlikely to create a severe
epidemic. In light of this, officials have taken many steps that may
have been unnecessary, including mass vaccinations. But how did
all this happen? It appears that ONE MAN, Albert OSTERHAUS, advised the WORLD
HEALTH ORGANIZATION to do this, got them all crazy about the coming
pandemic that never happened. SEE:

It is not clear how H1N1 will act in the coming months, but swine flu
cases seem to have already disappeared. Face it folks we were
swinedoggled, bamboozled, fooled, taken for a ride so that
BAXTER LABS, NOVARTIS and SMITH KLINE could make some big billions.
In 2014 they did it with measles. They do it annually with FLU.

Although some argue swine flu was just a practice session for the next vaccine, the one
that will rid the uberwealthy oligarchs of all of us useless eaters who take the parking places
outside the Ritz when the Oligarch wants to double park and get his lunch.

While many so-called scientific experts have criticized me and others
who have spoken out about the fear-mongering and senseless
mass-vaccination campaign surrounding the swine flu, more of the
scientific community is now coming to the same conclusions we've been
talking about for months.

The swine flu pandemic was a pandemic that never materialized, just
exactly as I predicted.

Now it looks as though the H1N1 scare of 2009 will go down as one of the
biggest government and pharmaceutical scams ever, renewing a healthy,
and necessary, skepticism about government fear-mongering, the swine flu
vaccine and the dubious dealings behind the implementation of worldwide
mass-vaccination programs.

It started last month when British and French media began saying the
H1N1 pandemic has been "hyped" by medical researchers to further their
own cause, boost research grants and line the pockets of drug companies.

Ontario health officials have also declared H1N1 a dud'pandemic,
stating the huge government investment made so far may have been
unjustified. And now, a new study by researchers at Harvard University
and the Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit in the U.K. is
finding that this pandemic'was never a cause for alarm.

After analyzing H1N1 deaths in the United States in the spring, then
projecting outcomes for this past fall, they found the fu season should
have been no different than a typical flu season -- and possibly even
milder than average!

Early Studies Showed H1N1 Was NOT Dangerous or Highly Contagious

In the beginning, even before it was declared a level 6 pandemic by the
World Health Organization (WHO), a group of scientists'were
sounding the alarm that this might indeed be the terrifying, deadly
pandemic they had been expecting for over half a century.

We were told that young, healthy people, pregnant women and small
children were falling ill and quickly dying, and the virus was spreading
rapidly. They even suggested it could mutate into an even more dangerous
form that could kill countless numbers of people.

Well, Dr. Russell Blaylock recently shared some information that shows
health officials knew very early on that H1N1 was probably not much more
of a threat than the seasonal flu that surfaces every year. He says:

Once the pandemic had been declared, virologists tested the potency
of this virus using a conventional method, that is, infecting ferrets
with the virus. What they found was that the H1N1 virus was no more
pathogenic than the ordinary seasonal flu, even though it did penetrate
slightly deeper into the lungs.

It in no way matched the pathogenecity of the 1917-1918 H1N1 virus. It
also did not infect other tissues, and especially important, it did not
infect the brain.

Next, they wanted to test the ability of the virus to spread among the
population. The results of their tests were conflicting, but the best
evidence indicated that the virus did not spread to others very well.

In fact, an unpublished study by the CDC found that when one member of a
family contracted the H1N1 virus, other members of the family were
infected only 10% of the time -- a very low communicability.”

Of course, nothing sells vaccines like panic, so you likely did not hear
about this in the media. That is, until now.

The CDC Was Way Off Why are They Still Pushing the Vaccine?

The CDC previously estimated that the U.S. death toll from the swine flu
would be around 90,000. Even using their own bloated numbers -- some 80
percent of which are in all likelihood unrelated to H1N1 -- 9,820 people
have actually died from H1N1 from April through November.

That would STILL, according to their own statistics stating that the flu
kills 36,000 Americans a year, put us squarely in the middle of the
mildest flu season in recent memory.

Meanwhile, the CDC's own data states that flu activity is continuing
to fall across the United States, with only 11 states still reporting
widespread flu activity as of mid-December.

Yet, they are still touting the H1N1 vaccine as the best way to protect
against this pandemic'virus.

Well, as the word continues to get out that swine flu is another
pandemic'that never was ranking right up there with the bird
flu hoax back in 2005 it looks as though the CDC is going to have a
heck of a lot of surplus H1N1 vaccines on their hands.

So now they are stating that supplies of H1N1 vaccine are increasing and
many places have opened up vaccination to anyone who wants it.
Fortunately, many do not.

But the U.S. federal government has contracts to purchase 250 million
doses of swine flu vaccine, which may explain why the Los Angeles Times
recently reported that:

Health officials' biggest fear now is that, with the perception that
the pandemic is waning, many people will decide they don't need the

That the swine flu is waning'is not a perception, it's a fact,
but Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius is not giving
up on selling those shots, either. She stated in a news conference:

"We have a wonderful window of opportunity to prevent or lessen a third
wave." A third wave? Excuse me, but we're still waiting for the first and second to show

So it appears the WHO and governments around the world are going to keep
pushing their H1N1 vaccines through the winter and into spring, even
though swine flu cases are dwindling and are nowhere near what you would
call a true, dangerous pandemic.

The latest news confirms that H1N1 peaked in October 2009:

In Britain, health authorities' original worst-case scenario -- which
said as many as 65,000 could die from H1N1 -- has twice been revised
down and the prediction is now for around 1,000 deaths. This is way
below their average annual toll of 4,000 to 8,000 deaths from seasonal

And the National Institute for Health and Welfare in Finland actually
removed swine flu from a list of diseases considered dangerous to the
public -- and that was back in July!

WHO Advisor Secretly Pads Pockets with Big Pharma Money (Jan 2010)

A Finnish member of the World Health Organization board, an advisor on
vaccines, has received 6 million Euros for his research center from
the vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline.

Although WHO promises transparency, this conflict of interest is not
available for the public to see at WHO?s homepage.

Professor Juhani Eskola is the director of the Finnish research
vaccine program and a new member of the WHO group ?Strategic Advisory
Group of Experts? (SAGE).

SAGE recommends which vaccines -- and how many -- member countries
should purchase for the pandemic.

According to documents acquired through the Danish Freedom of
Information Act, Eskola?s Finnish institute, THL, received almost 6.3
million Euros from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for research on vaccines
during 2009. GlaxoSmithKline produces the H1N1-vaccine ?Pandemrix,?
which the Finnish government -- following recommendations from THL and
WHO -- purchased for a national pandemic reserve stockpile.

Several other WHO experts also have financial ties to the
pharmaceutical industry--a double role that notably is not published
by WHO.

The Flu Case December 17, 2009

    The World Health Organization (WHO) proclaims itself to be an
agency that is responsible for providing leadership on global health
matters, shaping the health research agenda, setting norms and
standards, articulating evidence-based policy options, providing
technical support to countries and monitoring and assessing health

    If this is the kind of leadership they offer, you should run the
other direction!

    The more than 6.3 million Euros (equating to over 9 million
American dollars) the WHO?s research center received from
GlaxoSmithKline represents the vaccine program?s number one income

    To which they respond, ?We are aware that there appears to be a
conflict interest.?


    And this is on the heels of a major WHO scandal involving
accusations by Austrian journalist Jane Burgermeister that the WHO
conspired with Baxter International (a vaccine manufacturer) and the
United Nations to produce and release live bird flu virus in 2009, in
an effort to trigger a pandemic.

    Burgermeister has accused them of ?planning to commit mass murder.?

WHO'S Who in Government Corruption

    As the Flu Case article states, this financial conflict of
interest is not an isolated incident with one researcher?the following
list of WHO researchers, reported to have financial ties to Big
Pharma, suggests a more systemic corruption:

        *  Dr. Peter Figueroa, Professor in the Department of
Community Health and Psychiatry in Jamaica, has received money from
        *  Dr. Neil Ferguson has received funding from Baxter,
GlaxoSmithKline, and Roche, as well as from some insurance companies
        *  Professor Malik Peiris in Hong Kong has received money from
Baxter GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi Pasteur
        *  Dr. Arnold Monto, advisor to Chiron, GlaxoSmithKline,
MedImmune, Roche, Novartis, Baxter and Sanofi Pasteur, has received
funding from same
        *  Dr. Friedrich Hayden, consultant to MedImmune and Sanofi
Pasteur, received money from those companies, in addition to Roche, RW
Johnson, and SmithKline Beecham

Introducing Dr. Flu

    And then there is Dr. Albert Osterhaus, nicknamed ?Dr. Flu?
because he is head of the European Scientists Fighting Influenza
within the WHO.

    Dr. Osterhaus is a Dutch physician who has been very active in
promoting mass vaccination through WHO and the Western media[i]. The
government of the Netherlands is currently conducting an emergency
investigation into the activities of ?Dr. Flu? since it was recently
discovered that he has been receiving a salary from several swine flu
vaccine companies.

    Dr. Osterhaus has received funding from Baxter, Crucell, Novartis,
Hoffman-La Roche, MedImmune, Nobilon, Sanofi Pasteur, MSD,
GlaxoSmithKline, and Solvay.

    The WHO is in the powerful position of reviewing and making
vaccine recommendations to the world. Tom Jefferson, professor of
epidemiology at the Cochrane Center in Rome, aptly states:

        'It is disturbing that many of the scientists who sit on
various committees of WHO, are presented as 'independent experts', but
they carefully conceal the fact that they receive money from
pharmaceutical companies.

    Dr. Jefferson goes on to tell reporters:

       "The WHO is biased in their recommendations. Normal hygiene
measures provide much greater effect than these little-studied
vaccines, and at the same time WHO refers to the use of masks and
hand-washing as a means to combat swine flu only twice in their
documents. Vaccines and other medications are referred to 42 times!"

    But hand washing never made anyone wealthy.

    Dr. Jefferson and several of his colleagues believe that paid
advisers of the pharmaceutical companies should be removed from their
positions and not allowed to give recommendations to the WHO.

    I couldn't agree more. But the organization itself is in no hurry
to carry out such reform.

The Evil Geniuses of Big Pharma

    The WHO is not unique in its vulnerability to the influence of Big Pharma.

    Washington teems with a thousand industrial lobbyists. They
cluster around the band of luxury offices and expensive restaurants
that stretches from the White House to the Capitol building--a
two-mile axis along which money and power are constantly traded.

    In this pantheon of corporate muscle, no industry wields as much
power as the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association
(PhRMA), a pressure group renowned for its deep pockets and
aggression, even by the standards of U.S. politics.

    There is also a perpetual revolving door between government and
the pharmaceutical industry?more and more key government positions are
filled with people living 'double-lives' with drug/healthcare

        * President Obama's nominee at the Department of Homeland
Security overseeing bioterrorism defense, Dr. Tara OToole, has served
as a key advisor for a lobbying group funded by a pharmaceutical
company that has asked the government to spend more money for anthrax
vaccines and biodefense research.
        *  Tom Daschle?the former Democratic senator from South Dakota
and Senate Majority Leader?who was President Obama?s first pick for
secretary of health and human services. Daschle?s work included being
a paid advisor for a lobbying law firm that earned $16 million
representing some of the healthcare industry?s most powerful
interests.Of course, as you might recall, this nomination didn?t fly.
        *   Senior Advisor David Axelrod is accused of collecting big
money from Big Pharma to pass healthcare reform by way of his former
partners at a Chicago-based firm called AKPD Message and Media. In
fact, he founded the firm, and his son is still employed there.[iii]

    These are but a few examples?there are many more to be found.

    To quote Democratic congressman Sherrod Brown:

        Pharm doesnt need to lobby. The industry is in the While
House already.?

    Drug giants not only specialize in influencing government
officials, but they also have the ordinary physician in their grips.

    The practice by drug companies of lavishing gifts upon doctors?far
beyond pens and mugs?including exclusive vacations, ?consulting?
agreements that involve little work and other freebies?is gaining
increased scrutiny and disapproval in the public?s eye.

    Even more quietly, another practice is growing in popularity.

    This devious ploy involves private-practice physicians setting up
tax-exempt charities, which then receive major donations' to the tune
of millions of dollars a year' from drug companies and medical device
makers. The 'charities' then typically conduct medical research or
education, which the physicians behind them promote as being

    Increasingly, Big Pharma spends billions to influence what doctors
see, read and hear, often persuading them to prescribe more drugs,
just as it spends billions to taint researchers? decision-making

    A national survey of physicians published in the New England
Journal of Medicine in 2007, well-known and often quoted, found that
94 percent of physicians have a "relationship" with the
pharmaceutical, medical device, or other related industries.

    This massive conflict of interest has prompted Senators Chuck
Grassley and Herb Kohl to introduce a bill called the Physician
Payment Sunshine Act, which would require physicians to report
annually to the government all payments over $100, beginning in 2010,
and that information would be made available to the public.

What's the Cost of Pushing Pills These Days?

    Exactly how much does the pharmaceutical industry spend to push
its products?

    A study in 2008 endeavored to measure those costs, and the
results are staggering.

    They calculated that Big Pharma spends almost twice as much on
promotion as they spend on research and development:

       1. The industry spent $57.5 billion on marketing and promotion
in 2004. (This estimate far exceeds the $20 billion estimated by the
research firm called Integrated Medical Systems (IMS), which is most
often quoted.)
       2. The amount spent on research and development pales in
comparison, at $31.5 billion.

    Add to that what the industry spends in lobbying, and it adds up
to a mind-numbing figure.

    These numbers clearly demonstrate the need for redirecting the
priorities of the industry toward more research and less marketing,
besides the need for quashing the greed and corruption that run so
rampant within it.

Trust Allah, But Tie Up Your Camel

    Until the umbilical cord between Big Pharma and the government is
cut, healthcare/health policy reform will remain a dream. Until then,
take what your government and your physician tell you with a grain of
salt.  Trust but verify.

    Remain proactive, educating yourself on these issues rather than
simply believing the press releases that are reiterated a hundred
times on every cable channel.

-- So I have just one further sentiment I'd like to say to the media and
health officials in the United States who are still trying to perpetuate
the swine flu myth:

It's time to let it go now -- the jig is up.

Related Links:

Swine Flu -- One of the Most Massive Cover-ups in American History

CBS Reveals that Swine Flu Cases Seriously Overestimated

Major Victory with Swine Flu Scandal