SUMMATION OF THE COPENHOAXEN CONFERENCE.
or --WHO DID WHAT TO WHOM.

Here are two very revealing reports on the Copenhagen conference collected online, sent me by Researcher RK MOORE.  (You can get on his list, write him at addie at bottom.)

Fidel Castro gives a blow-by-blow journalistic account of what actually happened. He reports:
"From the evening of December 17 and the early morning hours of
December 18, the prime minister of Denmark and senior representatives of
the United States had been meeting with the chairperson of the European
Commission and the leaders of 27 nations to introduce to them -- on behalf
of Obama -- a draft agreement in whose elaboration none of the other
leaders of the rest of the world had taken part.

"... A small number of countries firmly insisted on the grave
omissions and ambiguities of the document promoted by the United States,
particularly the absence of a commitment by the developed countries on the
reduction of carbon emissions and on the financing that would allow the
global South countries to adopt alleviating and adjustment measures. After
a long and extremely tense discussion, the position of the ALBA countries
and Sudan, as president of the G-77, prevailed that the document was
unacceptable to the conference thus it could not be adopted. In view of the
absence of consensus, the conference could only “take note” of the
existence of that document representing the position of a group of about 25
countries.

"In the globalist version, we get a grossly falsified account of these same
events: The [UK] climate secretary, Ed Miliband, today accuses China,
Sudan, Bolivia and other leftwing Latin American countries of trying to
hijack the UN climate summit and "hold the world to ransom" to prevent a
deal being reached. ... The prime minister, Gordon Brown, will repeat some
of the UK's accusations in a webcast tomorrow when he says: "Never again
should we face the deadlock that threatened to pull down [those] talks.
Never again should we let a global deal to move towards a greener future be
held to ransom by only a handful of countries."To the Guardian's credit,
they don't endorse this account. Their article goes on, more in agreement
with Castro's remarks: But in what threatened to become an international
incident, diplomats and environment groups hit back by saying Britain and
other countries, including the US and Australia, had dictated the terms of
the weak Copenhagen agreement, imposing it on the world's poor "at the
peril of the millions of common masses". But of course it is Gordon Brown's
statements that will get the most media coverage in Britain. It is from
Brown that we can see what the post-Copenhagen propaganda line will be.
What does all this mean? Here's how I see it...First, we know what kind of
climate-change deal the Bilderberger crowd want. They want a deal that
doesn't place any restrictions on the rich nations, but is draconian for
the poor nations. Clearly they knew such a deal wouldn't be accepted in
Copenhagen. So with all the hoopla, pretending they hoped for agreement in
Copenhagen, they now say it was the poor countries that 'held the world
ransom'. When Brown says, "Never again should we face the deadlock", he
clearly means that he wants to set up a system where the rich nations can
impose their will on the rest. In other words, a global government
controlled by the Bilderberger crowd. Lots of us are not at all surprised
by this, but it's now been spelled out rather clearly. The public concern
created by the global warming scam is being channeled into creating a world
government. We won't get any meaningful reductions in Co2 emissions,
because they know global warming isn't really a problem. But we'll get
carbon taxes and carbon rationing, and they'll get huge profits from their
cap-and-trade bubble scam."  signed, Fidel Castro

The best scientific overview of the climate issue I've seen is this one,
sent to me by Patricia Tursi: "Global Warming: The Origin and Nature of the Alleged Scientific
Consensus" Richard S. Lindzen
Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology

The best single article I've seen on the temperature data, is this one:
Hockey stick observed in NOAA ice core data
J. Storrs Hall
Foresight Institute
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/09/hockey-stick-observed-in-noaa-ice-core-data/

This is the article whose accuracy I checked by downloading the official
data into Excel and reproducing the graphs. If anyone knows where I can
download ice-core temperature data for other locations, PLEASE let me
know." signed, RK, the man who collected this info, the researcher
 RK MOORE is at rkm@quaylargo.com

<===BACK TO "WHO TURNED OFF THE WEATHER?" a  WEBSITE.