consciousness & social transformation by rkmoore
Their central idea is that the whole universe, at every level from the quantum
to the galactic, is both conscious and evolving. One of the ideas they explore
is that as complexity increases, new kinds of order emerge, and sudden and
unpredictable changes of state can occur. Evolution is episodic
(unpredictable radical changes) rather than continuous. In the domain of
species evolution, the Cambrian revolution would be an episodic example. In the
domain of cultural and social evolution, the agricultural revolution
would be an episodic example.
If it is social transformation that we are seeking, then I suggest that we
need to be thinking in terms of episodic evolution in the social and cultural
domain, not the personal. The agricultural revolution, for example, did not
emerge because people suddenly become smarter, or reached a more evolved state
of consciousness. It was other kinds of forces that were involved,
environmental changes and so forth. People were quite evolved enough, as they
were, to adapt to the new paradigm and make the most of it.
Personal evolution is
important. Humanity has been making steady progress, with so much anti-racism,
anti-genocide, anti-war movements and with environmental awareness, and with so
many people paying attention to, and acting on, the consciousness ideas that
Amy, Ken Wilbur, and others who write consciousness expanding instructions.
(NOTE: The TAROT CARD the MOON tells us that man is like a wolf who must be
driven to walk the golden road by the biting lobster in the waters of the
unconscious. It's so painful to be human and vulnerable that we will transform
ourselves from brutal rapacious WOLF to gentle, loyal dogs and go beyond
the duality of the mind, symbolized by the twin towers of stone, yes/ no
thinking, me gain, me lose thinking ... and travel to the highest mountains of
consciousness. At that point, heavenly blessings fall on us. The gold flakes
are the SIDDHIS or supernatural powers of Gods on Earth. ) We've been
preparing ourselves, perhaps due to some emerging morphic field, for a 'change
of state' in the social and cultural domain. The socialist 30's, the anti-war,
dissident 60's and now the scary Millennium recession which tends to make all
the thieves more rapacious.) MOST of us are doing well enough in preparing
ourselves, and without dropping the spiritual studies, we need to shift our
focus of attention to the social and cultural domain itself.
A progressive, rebellious but affirmative change-of-state in that domain is
on our doorstep. A new level of complexity has emerged, with globalization, the
Internet, OCCUPY, WIKILEAKS. The old order has progressed to sharp Nazism, Me
and My Money thinking which we see when we look at bought politicians, Wall
Street, market forces collapsing, as was always inevitable. A change of
state is underway, in the social and cultural domain, but it's outcome is not
yet determined. It's not a matter of whether we'll have social transformation,
it's a matter of what form it will take.
There is a force toward the center that is operating, toward greater
centralization of power, and tighter control over the masses (e.g., NSA
surveillance, militarized police, increasingly harsh suppression of protests)
and there is a force toward grassroots empowerment that is operating, as more
and more people wake up and pursue change in one way or another. I suggest that
these are the forces, within the many forces that underlie the universe, that
we need to perceive and consciously work with, if we seek social transformation.
It makes sense to compare the two forces. The grassroots has numbers on its
side, and the center has the power of the establishment (military and all the
rest) on its side. But from the point of view of consciousness, relative power
is not the biggest difference between the forces. The biggest difference is
that the center has something resembling a coherent consciousness, while the
grassroots doesn't.
Certainly there are divisions and conflicts in high circles, and pluralism
in the system. But the shared interest in 'staying on top', in this time of
chaotic change and widespread unrest, brings those on top into increasing unity
of purpose, as we see from the various preparations to keep the masses under
control. The force toward the center, in this time of episodic transformation,
is leading to an increase in coherent consciousness at the top.
Meanwhile, in the grassroots, we are responding to impending change not
with any kind of coherent consciousness, but more like a disturbed hill of
ants, scurrying in every activist direction while most of the ants (the
non-active majority) cling for security to business as usual.
Answer Amy's call to action, and then summarize these observations: we can and indeed, must develop our own powers to
perceive the forces that underlie the universe and then use those powers to
consciously create a much better world.
From the perspective of evolution, at the level of culture and society, we
are at the chaotic stage of an episodic change of state. At such times new and
unpredicted forms of system organization have an opportunity to emerge. One
seeking-to-emerge outcome is a more centralized form of organization, enabling
the management of resources and populations, and replacing the dynamics of
growth and market forces. Another seeking-to-emerge outcome is some kind of
decentralized form of organization, empowered by energy at the
grassroots. The energy at the grassroots, however, lacks any kind of
coherent consciousness.
There are however forces pushing toward the emergence of grassroots
coherence. The accessibility of global communications, including even the mass
media, has been leading toward convergences in perspectives on a global scale.
The Internet in particular has led to a renaissance in grassroots creativity,
and the wide sharing of innovative ideas in all areas of thought and endeavor.
Movement leaders, meanwhile, are searching for new ways to be effective. It's
like the sparks are flying in an embryonic grassroots mind, but haven't yet
gelled into any kind of coherent consciousness.
If we want to help create a better world, and if we want to work with the
evolutionary forces that underlie the universe, then it seems to me we need to
be encouraging the emergence of coherence (100th monkey theory,) in
grassroots energy, and ultimately the emergence of a coherent we-the-people
consciousness anchored in a decentralized form of organization. A rare
opportunity exists for such a radical social and cultural transformation to
occur, in this chaotic stage of episodic social evolution, as the old
organizing principle is collapsing.
There is already a considerable energy focus among progressive activists
and visionaries in the direction of decentralized organization. This focus is
expressed in the Transition Town movement, along with initiatives promoting
local currencies, buy-local campaigns, community gardens, ecovillages, and
farmer's markets. These initiatives reflect a growing recognition that the old
growth-based economic order cannot last, and they are seeking to create a
sustainable economic order, by means of locally-based initiatives.
These initiatives have social transformation in mind they are not simply
local self-help movements. They have a vision of creating a new economic order
based on the decentralized management of resources and economics. They
represent the emergence of a decentralized ordering principle, competing with
the emergence of a greater-centralization ordering principle, in this time of
chaotic transition.
At the community level, these initiatives are pursued autonomously by local
activists, and their aim is to get the community as a whole to engage in their
initiatives. Their strategy for bringing about change is ultimately based on
this organizational paradigm: If we all work together, here in our
community, we can create a better future for ourselves.
From this perspective, we can see that these movements toward
decentralization carry within them the seeds of coherent grassroots
consciousness. If the community as a whole were to engage with the initiatives,
and start working together to shape its own future, then that community would
indeed be developing a coherent local consciousness, and it would be
increasingly acting as a coherent, learning organism, based on that
consciousness.
These initiatives, though widespread geographically, have not so far been
able to get whole communities to work together to shape their own future. In
the overall scheme of things the initiatives have remained marginal, and show
no signs of growing beyond that. Nonetheless they are out there, with
considerable energy behind them, awaiting the emergence of conditions that will
enable them to ignite local engagement.
Let's explore briefly this notion of a community as a coherent, learning
organism, with a growing coherent consciousness. It leads to a vision of
society as an ecosystem of interacting autonomous communities, each operating
on the let's-all-work-together paradigm. It seems self evident to me that the
relationship between such communities would naturally also be based on the same
paradigm it would become a core cultural principle - the way things get done
throughout such a society.
Lest misunderstanding slip in here, let me underscore that this emergent
let's-all-work-together paradigm is about voluntary collaboration for mutual
benefit. It is not about any kind of communist vision, or any kind of surrender
of the individual to the collective. It is about the empowerment of the
individual through participating voluntarily in locally-generated cooperative
endeavors aimed at making a better future for everyone. Doing business with one
another, under agreed rules of conduct, using an agreed currency, is one
example of a voluntary cooperative endeavor.
The seeds of such a society, I suggest, are being carried within the
decentralization initiatives, regardless of whether or not the activists
involved consciously hold such visions. We are seeing the emergence of a
morphic field, generated by the energy of sustainability-consciouness, but
whose circle of resonance turns out to be much wider, extending to a culture of
voluntary collaboration, and a society organized on the basis of locally
coherent grassroots consciousness.
If this voluntary-collaboration morphic field were to get energized past a
certain tipping point, of scale and coherence, via community initiatives of
various kinds, it could become a real contender for evolutionary dominance,
even in the face of the seemingly all-powerful morphic field emerging around
greater centralization. It has legs. So far however, this grassroots-based
morphic field remains in an embryonic holding pattern, the flame being
fortunately maintained by a persistent band of decentralization activists.
In order to consider the question of how this morphic field might be
energized, we need to step back and consider a much wider social context. In
particular, we need to think about the 'field of public consciousness', and the
question of subfields of morphic resonance, and how they interact with
one another. It is in this field of public consciousness that our embryonic
morphic field will need to struggle for emergence and growth.
There are many subfields of morphic resonance in our societies, of
one degree of coherence or another. We've been considering so far a relatively
marginal subfield, of like-minded activists, whose value lies latent. We now
need to turn our attention to the more dominant subfields of morphic resonance
in our societies, those energized by strong attractors, such as religions,
political parties, popular causes, class identities, and shared economic
circumstances.
It takes but little reflection on this 'field of public
consciousness' to see that the various resonant subfields are in a
chaotic relationship with one another. If we try to think of 'the field of
public consciousness' as a 'popular mind', we would have to diagnose it as
being a severely schizophrenic mind. A mind with strong urges pulling in
different directions, and with no ability to manifest coherence out of that
chaos apart from handing that responsibility over to governments, who are
increasingly entranced by the morphic subfield whose center of resonance is the
centralization of power.
When decentralization activists try to promote their initiatives in their communities,
it is like someone trying to explain to a person who is suffering from severe
schizophrenia how their life can be fixed. Such a person doesn't respond to
logical reasoning from laymen, they need appropriate therapy first. They need
coherence of mind before they can benefit from logical thinking.
The morphic field around decentralization holds the seeds of coherent
community consciousness, but those seeds cannot be planted until some degree of
coherent community consciousness emerges by some other means. Therapeutic
intervention is called for, aimed at generating some degree of harmonization
where now there is only chaotic dissonance, among the dominant subfields of
morphic resonance in our communities.
To put that in plainer language, communication and mutual understanding
needs to be nurtured among the various segments of our communities. They need
to understand one another's concerns, and to learn to respect one another as
fellow members of the same community. These kinds of things need to happen to a
sufficient degree, and on a sufficient scale within a community, to enable
enough overall coherence to emerge, so that it will make sense to begin talking
about sensible directions for community energy. You can't talk about community
energy as a reified thing, until there is some semblance of coherent community
consciousness.
If we envision an activist initiative, aimed at fostering mutual
understanding among segments of a community, it would have certain advantages
in its favor, as compared to most activist initiatives, which are aimed at
engaging citizens in some kind of action. Our envisioned initiative would
simply be about people talking with one another, with no need to solve any
problem, or reach any agreement, but simply to understand where one another are
coming from.
One could imagine such an initiative taking many forms, from organizing
neighborhood potluck conversations, to organizing a series of community
presentations in a public hall, where different groups take turns telling their
stories.
There is perhaps inspiration we can take, in this regard, from an episodic
shift that happened in human consciousness about 50,000 years ago. This was one
of the topics the three visionaries talked about in their video conversations.
50,000 years ago is when cave paintings first appeared, and evidence of early
religions first emerged. Ralph Abraham said that skull-evidence reveals that a
change in brain structure occurred about then, a stronger connection between
the left and right hemispheres.
The left brain operates linearly and logically, while the right brain
operates in terms of patterns and images. A stronger connection between them
means the two hemispheres can work together in new and different ways. As
regards cave paintings, one can imagine that the artist's left brain has a
goal, of painting an animal in action, and by means of the stronger connection
can call on the right brain to recall an image of the animal in action, so it
can be referred to while paining. That is to say, the stronger connection
enables enhanced functioning of the human imagination.
The different segments of our community are like poorly connected brain
lobes. And like the left and right brains they each have a contribution to make
to the whole but they don't talk to one another. Just as the strengthening of
brain connections led to enhanced individual imagination, so can enhanced
communication among segments lead to enhanced community imagination, as well as
more coherent community consciousness generally.
The decentralization morphic field would be able to merge its imaginative
energy into the emerging consciousness field of the community, making its
contribution along with others we may not anticipate.
Let me close by citing once again Amy's call to action:. we can and indeed, must develop our own powers to perceive
the forces that underlie the universe and then use those powers to
consciously create a much better world. You want to be forwarding the action, at
least so you can answer the grandkids when they ask, what were you doing
during that time, grandpa? Granny?
<=======BACK TO THE HOW TO
ACHIEVE CONSCIOUSNESS PAGE
<=======BACK TO THE ACTIVISM IS
EASY PAGE